---

1.媒體來源:台北時報(Taipei Times)

2.完整新聞標題/內文:

大意大概是說沒有人誤導他，純粹是誤解。

有待強者提供合適的翻譯了。

更重要的是旺中所謂的喬姆斯基回信截圖:

http://ppt.cc/sftD

好像有些怪怪的喔！

Chomsky denies being deceived in media dispute

Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Noam Chomsky yesterday sought
to clarify matters regarding allegations by media owned by the Want Want
China Times Group (旺旺中時集團) this week that he had said he was “misled”
 by a Taiwanese student who asked him to have his picture taken with a
placard opposing media monopolization in Taiwan.
In a series of articles on Thursday, the Chinese-language China Times, one of
the many publications owned by the group, claimed that Chomsky, along with
New York University (NYU) professor Ned Block, were “misled” by not having
the full content of the Chinese message on the placard explained to them. The
controversy centered on the part of the text that read in Mandarin: “Say no
to China’s black hands,” a reference to Chinese influence in Taiwanese
media.
Several articles and commentaries on talk shows run on TV stations controlled
by Want Want vilified Lin Ting-an (林庭安), a graduate student at National
Yang Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, who
approached Chomsky for his support. The reports accused her of
misrepresenting the facts to the 84-year-old professor.
Chomsky, who said he had been deluged with letters about the controversy from
individuals and the media, clarified his stance in an e-mail yesterday, which
he said also stood for Block.
“I have been in touch with my friend Ned Block, a philosophy professor at
NYU, who was also photographed holding a poster,” Chomsky wrote. “His
experience was the same as mine. Both of us were under the impression that
the poster called for freedom of press and opposed monopoly, and said nothing
about China.”
However, Chomsky denied he was misled.
“I don’t charge anyone with deceit or misrepresentation. I assume it was
simply a misunderstanding, resulting from the fact that neither of us reads
Chinese,” he wrote. “That’s the whole story. I don’t think there was any
bad faith, just misunderstanding.”
“She [Lin] may well have sent me an earlier email [clearly explaining the
situation and the threat of Chinese influence in Taiwan’s media environment]
as she says. The deluge of email is so enormous I can barely remember
yesterday. But neither Ned nor I were aware that the posted went beyond what
I just wrote,” Chomsky wrote.
Lin’s initial e-mail to Chomsky was made public earlier this week when Want
Want first claimed that she had misled him.
Contacted for comment on the incident, Bruce Jacobs, a professor of Asian
languages and studies at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, who last
month also posed for a picture holding the placard, said he had no idea what
Chomsky knew or did not know, or whether Lin made herself clear enough.
However, the Mandarin-speaking Jacobs, a longtime Taiwan watcher, said the
actions of the China Times and its affiliate CtiTV in the affair made it very
clear that the group and its chairman, Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明), are unfit to
occupy a larger share of Taiwan’s media environment.
Since Tsai’s acquisition of the China Times, Jacobs said, the paper’s
political stance has changed, with “a huge amount of censorship” that did
not occur prior to the acquisition.


3.新聞連結:

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2013/02/02/2003554016




4.備註:
(一個人一天只能張貼一則新聞，"被刪"或"自刪"也算額度內，超貼者劣文"請注意")


--

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.24.66.134
※ 編輯: OuterLander     來自: 114.24.66.134        (02/02 02:28)

--