---

https://m.facebook.com/JenniferLuTw/

呂欣潔 Jennifer Lu

37 分鐘前   編輯紀錄

從另一個角度思考恐怖攻擊的意義。以下摘譯這篇國外的文章觀點，和大家分享，一同思
考。

「事實上，伊斯蘭極端主義恐怖攻擊的最大受害者往往是其他穆斯林，而遭到西方國家反
恐行動所殺害的也都是一般穆斯林，因為我們無法辨別這兩個不同的群體。

巴黎恐怖攻擊的受害者和受害的穆斯林唯一的差別在於，這些穆斯林早就已經活在持續的
恐懼之中，並且他們的死傷不會受到世界的關注與悲憫。

可悲的現實是這種攻擊只會不斷增加。
你沒有辦法阻止幾個人帶著武器和一個扭曲的意識型態去傷害別人，正如同你也沒有辦法
阻止美國或是澳洲軍隊，以商業、戰略或政治利益進行屠殺。

西方人現在終於稍微嚐到其他國家人民幾個世紀以來所經歷的恐懼與苦難的滋味。

同情或支持法國人是好事，但更好的是同情和支持世界各地所有恐怖攻擊的受害者，尤其
是那些受到西方世界培植的恐怖主義傷害的受害者。」

http://tinyurl.com/oquhjv6

Paris Attacks Highlight Western Vulnerability, And Our Selective Grief And Out
rage




*
覺得說得挺棒的

然後呂欣潔FB底下有個網友留言放上了一篇文章 也挺棒

也在這邊貼上：

http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/3524

【投書】Dwiita Vita：請將伊斯蘭教與ISIS分開，因為ISIS不是伊斯蘭教的面貌

2015/11/14
作者:
Dwiita Vita











那麼為什麼，ISIS這樣的組織可以用過時的教條，來合理化謀殺和強姦，還同時創造他們
擁有宗教合法性的假象？











伊斯蘭教的理解，必須基於信仰本身（古蘭經和聖訓），並永遠選擇站在被壓迫者和在苦
難之中的人身邊。

（作者為居住於高雄的印尼籍看護工，第二屆移民工文學獎首獎得主。原文如下，由劉光
瑩翻譯。）

Please, Separate ISIS from Islam

" Because ISIS not the Face of Islam."

The world is in denial about the reality of Islamic terrorism by trying to deh
ypenate the two of the Islamic part from the terrorism. At the time when the I
slamic State of Iraq and Syiria (ISIS) or simply Islamic State, uses the holy
text in the Qur'an to correct their violent measure, it is disingenuous to pre
tend that this violence is unrelated to the faith.

As we know that ISIS was outward from the flare of internal politics betwen Ir
aq and Syria. Was standing on 9th April 2013 and Abu Bakar Al-Baghdadi as a Ch
aliphate or leader. And of course this goverment still is unilateral because b
oth in the country of Iraq and Syria or other countries not admit the existenc
e of ISIS.

Lately ISIS continues to make news by violating Islam and human rights. The li
st of horror is a long one. Sadly, it also exposes our collective failure as h
umanity to respond appropriately to extrimism. ISIS is setting the agenda and
highlighting our ineptness in the process. Take, for example how ISIS has been
 forcing ethnic Yazidi women into sexual slavery, they "ISIS" sais it rooted i
n historic precedence . Absolutely, that this claim in absurd and false. The t
urth is that from a doctrinal, Islamic prespective is as an affront to the nat
ural state of the freedom in which God created human beings. That is tied to t
he first pillar of Islam (declaration of faith). All human are equal before Go
d and are distinguished only by their own good action.

Indeed, the Qur'an advocated for a departure from this age-old practice of hum
an bondage. Calling for the just and humane treatment of slaves as human being
s and not property. It also encouraged the act of freeing slaves as an act of
worship. Slavery is out lawed throught the world and should never be reconside
red if we accept liberation as the most important value of Islam.

So why, that groups such as ISIS can used outdated dogma to rationalize murder
 and rape , create a facade of religious legitimacy?

The trouble comes from the fact that organization such as ISIS etc cherry pick
 tribal custom, then apply an Islamic veneer to rationalize them. And it is th
is deliberate muddying of reality that lies at the heart of struggle od ideas
within the muslim in the world today. ISIS try to exploit mis understanding of
 doctrine to further their own agendas. Yet while some muslim scholars have sp
oken out against ISIS's false claim. Other are either silent on the issue of a
bolishing such outrageous practices or worse.They suggest that muslims are com
miting a sin by demanding. We abandon practices that should be consigned to hi
story. Modern form of slavery, such as concubinage and human traficking is an
abomination.

Indeed, Islam as a religion developed as a religion for reforming society and
to elevate its norms and cultural practices closer to the Qur'anic ideals of f
reedom and equality. So to go back of the original essence of Islam is bring d
ignity to humanity. To bring mercy in the world, and to establish justice in t
he land within which we reside. Islam should be seen as a breath the fresh air
, a refuge from war and persecution, whether at the hands of religious or secu
lar rulers.

Muslims must do everything they can to break away from misogynist , maniacal,
maddening practices that are dressed up of Islamic. And Muslims must consisten
tly do more to define Islam to the broader publics, rather than simply respond
ing to each outrage by an extrimist group.

Islam is about free thinking and anything that runs counter to such freedom of
 thought, runs counter will of God. As the Qur'an states that God command just
ice and goodness and generocity, and He forbids all that is shameful and what
runs counter to reason. Islamic jurisprudence is not a rigid and immutable law
 based on unchanging rules written centuries ago. Instead, is a flexible and d
ynamic jurisprudence that is fully compatible with the modern human rights fra
mework.

Mainstream, understanding of Islam must be seen as the standart-bearer of the
faith  (Qur'an and Hadith), and on the side of anyone who oppressed and suffer
ing.

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 117.19.240.189
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1MHt4IMB (Gossiping)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1447522578.A.58B.html