---

Brooks出手有待加強，需要依賴其他球星
https://tinyurl.com/3zapdeuj
stadiumspeak

https://i.imgur.com/sV0yVX7.jpg
Dillon Brook的進攻效率
1. 場上有2-3個球星-
2. 場上有1-2個球星
3. 場上有0個球星-只有他！

Dillon Brooks was notgood last night without Ja - taking 19 shots and missing
14 of them. He’s a really trick evaluation because he’s played the same
exact role over the past 3 years as Memphis primary outside scorer (and its
been out of necessity cause this team just doesn’t have any).
And we haven’t really seen Brooks in many other contexts next to better
perimeter scoring talent. I suppose the 17.0 PPG justifies this role at first
glance, but Brooks has been horribly inefficient - 51.3% TS%.
There’s some ?s imo about how Brooks fits as a lower usage guy - his
shooting is a bit streaky and I don’t love his form, his driving off the
catch is solid but he’s not a good finisher, the decision making is not
always great… But if we look at some of his lower-usage lineups, we see a
much more efficient Dillon Brooks - especially if we go back to his rookie
year next to Conley, Tyreke, and Gasol.

在Ja Morant的缺席下，Dillon Brooks表現不佳，19投，14次失手。
評估Brooks很複雜。過去3年，他一直扮演了曼斐斯的主要外線得分手，因為球隊沒有其
他人。
除了外線得分天賦外，我們還沒看到Brooks在其他情況下的表現。
乍看之下，我認為 17.0 PPG 符合他的定位，但Brooks的效率非常低 - 51.3%TS%
我覺得他的投籃很吃手感而且我不喜歡他的投籃姿勢。
他的接球切入算穩定，但他不是一個好的終結者，他的決策一直都不太好。
在過去他的一些使用率較低的陣容，我們會看到一個更有效率的Brooks，例如他新秀那年
，跟Conley, Tyreke, and Gasol一起打球。


網友
It’s him to blame for the most part because he forces horrible shots
regardless of who’s playing or not
只能怪他，不管誰在場上，Brooks還是會選擇糟糕的出手。

作者
I think even in his lowest-usage contexts, Brooks is still gonna be Brooks. He
’ll be more efficient, but he’s still gonna get some of his bad shots up
我認為即使在使用率最低的情況下，Brooks仍然是Brooks。 他會更有效率，但他仍然會
有一些糟糕的投籃。

網友
Hes Marcus Smart with worse defense and no playmaking
他是防守更差 Marcus Smart但沒有進攻組織

作者
I think Smart is an interesting comp for Brooks. smart's a good case study of
a tough shotmaker with erratic decision-making who had to fit along other
better perimeter options (which brooks will likely have to do in the future).
It doesnt bode well that Smart wasnt a firm + on offense until he had a
passing leap this year - altho brooks is a better shotcreator.

我覺得拿Smart比Brooks很有趣，Smart是典型的高難度投籃手，投籃選擇不穩定，必須配
合其他更好的外線射手（Brooks 未來也需要）
這不是好兆頭「Smart的進攻並不穩定，直到他今年學到了傳球」（Brooks創造的投籃機
會比較好）

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 194.5.52.209 (臺灣)
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1YUsV1MW (NBA)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1652254657.A.5A0.html