---

原文標題：

Hiking taxes on households making more than $400,000 'is a priority': Biden
official
"對收入超過40萬美元的家庭加稅是優先事項" 拜登政府官員表示

原文連結：

https://reurl.cc/mq4DKY

發布時間：

Fri, April 2, 2021, 10:57 PM

原文內容：

President Biden is sticking to a campaign pledge to hike taxes on those
households making more than $400,000 to help pay for various new social
safety net programs, a Biden administration official told Yahoo Finance Live.

"That definitely has been the red line. It continues to be the red line. It
is a priority of the president," said Council of Economic Advisers member
Heather Boushey, when asked about the $400,000 dividing line.

Biden unveiled his $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan on Wednesday. Dubbed the
"American Jobs Plan," Biden is aiming to invest $621 billion into
transportation infrastructure, including the repair of roads, bridges,
transit and rail. More than $300 billion will be spent to replace lead water
pipes and upgrade sewers, invest in broadband access and improve the power
grid. The infrastructure plan is seen being mostly paid for by lifting the
corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%.

But in the coming weeks, Biden is expected to outline a new $2 trillion plan
for investments in child care, family tax credits and other domestic
programs. This plan will reportedly be funded by lifting taxes on those
households earning more than $400,000 a year, as Biden frequently stated
during is presidential campaign. In a mid-March press briefing, White House
press secretary Jen Psaki confirmed the hikes will target households with
income of $400,000 or more instead of individuals.

Numerous other tax hikes from the Biden administration could also be in the
cards, as Stifel's Chief Washington policy strategist Brian Gardner recently
told Yahoo Finance Live.

"The tax package that was announced as a part of the Made in America tax plan
focuses on corporate profits. What it does is it seeks to readjust our
corporate tax system to focus on making things here in the United States and
to not encourage firms to ship profits overseas or production overseas and to
make sure we have a tax system that's fair and taxes to make these
investments that benefit every family in America," Boushey explained.

comments:

Thomas>
And households with the ambition, education, natural talent and drive will
take the money and abilities to another country.

Thebuk>>
Good leave. If it wasn't for the free money from the printing press from the
last 30 years you would not have all this money. Go to another country where
they will dislike you as an American and only love your money.

Eddie>>>
Thomas is right.  Rich people have options.  One is to leave, with their
money and future tax payments.

Thebuk>>>>
Then leave. There will always be some educated people from India who will
come over and be glad to pay those taxes.

機翻如下：

拜登政府的一位官員告訴雅虎財經直播，總統拜登正在堅持競選承諾，對那些收入超過40
萬美元的家庭加稅，以幫助支付各種新的社會安全網專案。

"這絕對一直是紅線。它仍然是紅線。這是總統的一個優先事項。"當被問及40萬美元的分
界線時，經濟顧問委員會成員希瑟-布希說。





Stifel的首席華盛頓政策策略師Brian Gardner最近對雅虎財經直播表示，拜登政府的其
他眾多加稅措施也可能會出現。




Thomas>
而有志氣、有學歷、有天分、有魄力的家庭，會把錢和能力帶到另一個國家去。
Thebuk>>
滾啊。如果不是因為過去30年印刷廠的免費資金，你就不會有這些錢。去別的國家吧，他
們會不喜歡你這個美國人，只喜歡你的錢。
Eddie>>>
湯瑪斯是對的。 富人是有選擇的。 一個是離開，帶著他們的錢和未來的稅款。
Thebuk>>>>
那就滾。總會有一些來自印度的受過教育的人過來，他們會很樂意交這些稅。


Sonoma03>
I don't have an issue with raising taxes on the high income earners to some
degree, but Biden needs to raise his $400K threshold.  When you live in a
high tax and high cost of living area like California Bay Area or NYC,
working couples with kids making $400K per year aren't rich; it's more
equivalent to upper middle class in the rest of the country.  It's bad enough
that we lost tens of thousands of dollars in deductions with the $10K limit
on state and local taxes, which also had a major marriage penalty since a
working couple doesn't get 2x the limit.  And there is already the additional
Medicare tax and 3.8% added tax on net investment income.

我對在一定程度上提高高收入者的稅收沒有異議，但拜登需要提高他的40萬美元門檻。


John>
How about capping the amount of dividends taxed at capital gain rates?
Warren Buffets has often lamented that he is paying only 15% taxes & even his
secretary pays a higher rate. That is because Buffet makes tens of millions
from dividends as his primary source of income & only pays 15% taxes. If you
capped divs at $400K at cap gains rate & all divs in excess taxed as ordinary
income we would make Buffet "happy" & have plenty of revenue for
infrastructure from all of the multi-billionaires like Buffet, Gates, Soros,
Bezos, Oprah & J-Z, etc.
不如給按資本收益率徵稅的紅利金額設定上限？





心得/評論：


新聞內容還好

就是看看底下鄉民互嘴還不錯玩

護航仔和hater的戲碼真的不管到哪邊都一樣

除了互嘴還有哀號共產黨，

另外也有一些鄉民提出實際生活上的壓力線之類的東西


不過 "加稅" 對於真正的超級富豪影響有限應該算是常識了

加稅受影響的是社會上作為主力消費者的群體

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.200.171.220 (臺灣)
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1WQRvZf6 (Stock)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1617542755.A.A46.html