---

今日的QA~


For all those interested in modelling (real life modelling, like
plastic tank kits), Revell is offering its products with World of
Tanks codes inside. Pretty neat.

SS說目前Revell這家模型廠商，有在他們的模型裏頭提供WOT的儲值序號。


Also, the first FTR QA test was not successful: the questions were
not replied for some reason, but the player was not banned, so no
rules were broken. Will run a second test.

而上次測試的「FTR提問題到RU服的行動」似乎失敗了，問題都沒有被答覆
不過幫忙的發問者沒有被BAN，所以SS還會再做第二次測試。


- there is no special MM for platoons

  戰車排不會有特殊分房機制。

- the D-83 gun is not planned for World of Tanks (SS: Soviet
  experimental gun projected for IS-3, if I recall correctly with
  like 380mm pen)

  D-83不會再WOT裡面出現。（SS：這隻蘇聯的實驗性主炮是準備給IS-3替換
  用的，如果我記得沒錯他的真實穿深大概有380mm）

- Soviet "konisch" type squeezebore guns (for example the S-40 with
  76-57mm) are not planned

  不會有蘇聯版的縮徑炮（像是57到76mm的S-40）

- apparently, the ARL-44 armor and engine horsepower are correct
  in game, wikipedia (SS: well, at least the Russian one) has it
  wrong

  遊戲裡面的ARL-44裝甲數據是正確的，維基上面（SS：嗯...俄版維基）
  的數據是錯的。

- WoWp won't apparently have plans with 80-100mm guns

  WOWp暫時不會有配備80-100mm的機砲的飛機出現。

- SerB states that the autoloader vehicles implementation in WoT
  is okay

  SerB表示擁有自動裝填機的車在遊戲裡出現沒啥問題。

- the number reload timer in 8.9 is not based on any mod, it was
  made from scratch

  8.9裏頭的裝填秒數提示是WOT自己研發，不是從任何MOD來的。

- more functions, allowed by mods (SS: for example custom
  healthbars and such) do not appear in the game because their
  usefulness is “questionable”. When asked, who decides what is
  questionable, SerB replies that WoT is not a democracy and the
  developers decide what is useful and what is not



- XP gain when someone else is scouting: when damage done is equal
  , both TD/tanks and arty get the same amount of XP

  當有其他人為你偵查到敵車時，你獲得的經驗會增加；如果造成的傷害相
  同，不論是坦克、反坦或砲兵都會獲得同樣多的經驗值。

- there are no camo mechanism changes in 8.9

  8.9不會更動目前的掩蔽機制。

- there is a small XP bonus for surviving a battle, but SerB states
  it's not much

  在戰場上存活下來或有些微的經驗加成，但SerB說那真的不多。

- there is already a rough concept for the European tech tree, but
  it's very premature, SerB states that it is analogical a bit to
  the way Chinese tanks added (SS: as in, there are some local
  versions of existing tanks, just like China has for example the
  Chinese Chi-Ha)



- according to SerB, the F1 turret and not the prototype turret was
  picked for ARL-44, because there were very little differences
  between this turret and the regular one

  根據SerB的說法，FCM F1的砲塔並非是直接取自ARL-44的白板砲塔，因為
  FCM F1上面的那顆跟ARL-44上面的那顆有些許的差異。

- price of a shell is not determined by the shell power apparently
  (SS: that's why the Chinese 122mm HEAT shells were not made
  cheaper, even though their penetration was nerfed)

  彈藥的價格並非取決於彈藥的威力。（SS：這就是為什麼中國製的HEAT就
  算被NERF了還是這麼貴的原因）


- there is already a concept how to handle the European tech tree
  crews, it will be disclosed when the time is right

  早已經有一個如何處理歐洲線組員（譯：應該是跨國轉組員的問題）的構
  想，時機到了會告訴你們。（譯：還不謝主隆恩！？XD）

- apparently, there will be no special permanent reward for the
  best damage dealer of the losing team in randoms (as an
  improvement to the "courageous resistance")

  目前不會在隨機戰鬥中給予輸的那一方傷害輸出最大的玩家特別的永久獎
  勵。（就像目前版本中「奮勇抵抗」的獎勵）

- there will be at least one more patch in 2013 apart from 8.9

  除了8.9，2013還會至少再有一個更新。


同樣有問題的部分還是可以跟我說~

原文網址：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/23/23-10-2013/#more-4530


另外有一篇文章蠻有趣的，在講法國FCM F1以及相關的計畫

網址：http://tinyurl.com/kqaxlda


--

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.25.182.247
※ 編輯: tai33ru         來自: 114.25.182.247       (10/24 04:43)

--