---

比起每日Q&A

FTR每周Q&A的問題好像能引起大家的興趣

所以今天就優先翻這個吧 :D



1. Is it possible for battle results (debriefing) screens to be saved into
replays? If so, how high a priority does this have?

   任務報告有可能跟RP存在一起嗎？如果可以的話優先度大概多高？


This won’t be touched for now. We are working on server replays. (Storm)

   Storm：目前還不會做，我們正在弄伺服器RP

2. We know the developers are thinking of high-level (tier 10) content,
similiar to 7/42 battles. But are there are plans for any low level content,
based on the same principle? (7 players, tier 4-6 maximum as an example)

   之前有說開發組考慮做10階的團體對戰模式，那有可能做低階的（例如
   4-6階）的團體對戰嗎？

There are no plans for such content. (Storm)

   Storm：目前不考慮。

3. The French and the Chinese currently have their light branches up to tier
8 and we know there are such plans for the Germans (RU251) and Americans,
while the Soviets have only “paper” tanks for those tiers. What about the
Japanese and the British – are there any hightier candidates for the light
tank branch?



We haven’t found yet any fitting Japanese or British tanks. If we find data,
we will implement tanks. (Storm)

   Storm：目前沒有找到合適的，如果有任何資料，我們就會做。

Cannoneer explains this issue further:

   Cannoneer之後補充：

The most powerful light tank of the Imperial Army (eg. until 1945) is the
Ke-Ho, that we will have on tier 4. Many know already, that there will be
Type 61 (first mass-produced Japanese post-war tank) and STA-1 (first Type 61
prototype) in the release tree. Before STA-1, there were technical
requirements issued for a 20 ton tank with 76mm gun and after that for a 25
ton tank with 90mm gun – and after that the weight was increased to 30 tons
because of the thicker armor. That means there is some potential, but
unfortunately we don’t have information about the projects, that were
presented by the company as an answer to the requirements. One player on the
US forums collected all that is known at this moment about those projects
here.



   http://tinyurl.com/pznbbft 有機會再翻出來


For Britain, there are two potential candidates. First is the A46/FV301. A46
is a project from 1943 to replace the Stuart and Chaffee with something
carrying the 77mm gun (the same Comet has). FV301 is the development of the
A46 project. Unfortunately, there are no drawings found for A46 yet.



   http://tinyurl.com/nvdzd9p FV300系列介紹


The second is the light tank project by Vickers-Armstrong from 1960 (Vickers
Design No. 45569 T), armed with the same gun as the Centurion (20pdr), but
two times lighter. The development of this project led to the Vickers MBT.
Again, there are no drawings of this tank yet.





4. Are there any plans to implement player activated skills or perks for the
crew?

   有計畫加入可以讓玩家控制開關的組員歷練或技能嗎？

No, there are no such plans.

   目前沒有計畫。

5. Is it planned to increase the visual customization of vehicles, like
adding of achievement markers, extra toolboxes, sandbags and the like, if so,
could we expect that feature possibly next year?

   可能讓玩家有更多自訂車輛外觀的選項出現嗎？ 例如說貼出獎章、外掛
   工具箱、沙包或之類的。如果有這計畫，明年有機會看的到嗎？

Completely possible. But I will not reveal the details yet. (Storm)

   Storm：非常有可能！不過我們不會透漏更多細節。

6. On several meetings with EU British tank expert Challenger, it was openly
said that the current British tier 10 medium tank FV4202 is not historical
and that the armor was much worse in real life. Will the FV4202 see any
changes, aside from the possible 20 pounder stock gun? Specifically, bringing
the armor to historical parameters and replacing it with something else.



Yes, we are thinking about that question and adding the 20pdr gun as the
stock gun on current tier 10 tank will be only a half-hearted solution,
influencing balance.

   沒錯，我們正在考慮這個問題，但是將 20磅炮加到這台車上並不是個很
   好的解決辦法，而且也影響平衡。

7. Is there a chance to see the Chieftain tank (prototype) in 2014?

   2014年可能看到酋長式原型加到遊戲裡嗎？

There is a chance, but our only guess for now is first half of 2014

   這有可能，不過我們目前預估時間點會在2014上半年。

8. The multiturret mechanism: if it is implemented, will it be possible to
unlock secondary gun modules too? (for example, M3 Lee upgrading both the
75mm and the 37mm turret gun separately)

   如果多砲塔機制做好了，我們能夠在這台車上點出第二管炮的？（例如
   M3 Lee會有37mm跟75mm兩管炮）

Yes, definitely.

   肯定有

9. Can we expect to see South American tanks in the game at some point?

   未來某個時間點有可能會加入南美洲的坦克嗎？

Yes, one way or another they will appear. (SerB)

   會有的，不管用哪種方式。

10. Has the fate of the S-Tank been decided yet, given its complicated
suspension and aiming system?

   瑞典 S-Tank的命運已經決定了嗎？會讓他們有複雜的懸吊跟瞄準系統嗎？

For now, we don’t plan to implement it. All’s fine with the Swedes even
without this tank. (SerB) (as in, Swedish branch is filled)

   SerB： 目前我們沒計畫要做，目前規劃的瑞典線甚至沒有把它放進去。
   （也就是說，可能瑞典線已經放滿了。）

11. Will you add tanks and proposed tank designs from 1900 – 1921? Like the
Motorgeschütz (Burstyn tank), British Mark series, Saint-Chamond and A7V?

   會放入1900年到1921年之間的坦克嗎？（ Motorgeschütz、英國Mark系
   列、聖夏蒙或是德國A7V）

For now there are no plans for that, but principially it’s possible. (SerB)

   目前還沒有這個打算，不過原則上有可能。

12. Is there a plan to implement an American premium tank destroyer? Is there
any (even vague) ETA other than KTTS? (this is a very popular question)

   有計劃加入美國金幣TD嗎？預計大概何時實裝？

With high probability next year.

   明年有很大的機會會出。

13. Do skill bonuses such as improved ventilation or the commander bonus have
any effect on the Jack of All Trades skill effects? For instance, if the
commander fills in for one crew member, will this virtual crew member always
be 50% trained, regardless of ventilation, etc?



Yes, all bonuses apply.

   SerB：有影響，任何的熟練度加成都會生效。

14. A very common question: from previous communication with developers, we
know that the developers will not be banning “troll platoons” (for example
one tier 10 tank platooning with two tier 1 tanks) – could we please hear
the official reason, why are such platoons allowed, because many feel they
bring nothing to the game and are a destructive element only.



Such a platoon is compensated by other vehicles on the team being stronger

compared to the opponent. Battles consisting of only tier 10 tanks (with the
inclusion of Chaffee and tier 8 light tanks with 12 battletier) are
insignificantly few. (SerB)



15. The developers talked about server-side replays – if that happens, does
this mean the replays will be compatible with old versions?

   開發組曾提到在開發伺服器端RP ，如果這功能實裝了，是代表以前的RP
   會跟新版本相容嗎？

No. The versions will be incompatible the same way (as it is), since the
content, on which the replays are viewed is in changing (maps first and
foremost). (Storm)

   Storm：不是， 版本對應還是照舊，重點是RP的內容呈現方式改變。
   （地圖重製是目前最重要的工作）

16. Will they extend the friends list so that you can have several friends
there?

   你們會放寬好友數量限制以容納更多的好友嗎？

Yes. The next chat version the contact list will be made longer and improved.
(Storm)

   Storm：會的，在下個版本的聊天機制我們會改進聯繫名單，並將他做得
   更長。

17. Is there a possibility of low and high velocity ammunition for artillery
being introduced in the future as an option? (So an artillery player must
choose whether to fire a high velocity shell with flat curve, or “lob” a
low velocity shell under high angle, allowing him to reach behind obstacles
better, but sacrificing the velocity)



Maybe in the future, when we reach the artillery balance point we desire with
current simple rules.

   也許之後，如果未來必須平衡砲兵，我們傾向跟目前的機制一樣簡單。

18. I understand that the current 8.9 new German TD line is set for now, but I
’m curious however what led to the choice of the Waffentrager E-100 as the
top-tier, versus – say – the Waffentrager Panther in its various proposed
forms (such as the Rheinmetall’s “Skorpion”, see Doyle and Spielberger’s
work). The transition to the much larger and heavily armored (hull) E-100
seems jarring given the progression and playstyle of the line.



Scorpion is not strong enough for tier 10. No way. The point of the E-100 is
the fact it can mount more powerful and heavier AA system without such a loss
of mobility like the Maus has. And you can’t mount anything more powerful
than the tier 9 normal 128mm on the Panther chassis. (SerB)



19. Was it ever or is it considered for very good players (with “good”
 being defined by Wargaming-picked criteria such as winrate) to recieve
visual rewards for their mastery (new camouflage, possibly a reward tank in
extreme cases) as an incentive to “learn to play better”?



Such rewards were considered. For now, this will not be implemented because
of the possible “toxicity” of bad players. (SerB)

　　SerB：這提議可以列入考慮。不過目前考量到心術不正的玩家所造成的
   不確定性，目前不會發展這個想法。

20. Storm wrote recently that he expects a break between the Japanese tanks
and any new tanks added after them. Does this break also concern
(subjectively highly requested) French tanks (second heavy line) – or,
specifically, when it comes to tanks added after the Japanese, how high a
priority do the French heavies have?



For now we won’t comment on tank plans. There are many changes. (Storm)

   Storm：我們目前不評論任何坦克計畫，有很多變數。


原文網址：http://tinyurl.com/ontpdlt

然後今天有沒有人能夠幫忙翻一下Q&A??

明天早上要上德文應該是沒時間繼續翻了 OAQ

--

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 27.245.90.225

對不起...我念起來順就...早該想到是 Rhine-metall了QQQ

已更正 :)


了解~大致補上該段翻譯了 :)
※ 編輯: tai33ru         來自: 27.245.90.225        (11/02 02:28)

--