---

※ 引述《kkman168》之銘言：
:  一個外國政府為你台灣開了兩小時聽證會，國會議員把話都亮出來質詢美國政府主管東
: 亞事務的主管，內容從經貿、政治到國防，這對台灣還不算大事嗎?
: http://www.c-span.org/video/?318304-1/hearing-ustaiwan-relations
: 上述網址為全程聽證會(2014/3/14所舉辦) 這件事情同樣很重要 希望大家不要忽略
: https://www.facebook.com/hiankoan.ter 原消息來自左列
: 媒體如果要抄 請自我檢討 為什麼你們不知道這個消息
: 3/15當天你們所報導的東西除了馬航之外就是鹿茸和港女
: 什麼才是重要的值得矚目的報導 ?你們的專業在哪裡?
: 你們對台灣的影響很大 你們在新聞的呈現當中有多堅持專業原則有多深入探討思考
: 台灣就可能有多好 請好好加油
: 又記 網址上頭的文章非我本人所寫 不要抄
: 有英文字幕可以開 右下角的CC→Enable captions

這個聽證會實在太長了，
做了前幾分鐘(~00:06:20)的逐字稿和翻譯，還是沒看到重點，
不過大致的意思就是：

1. 台灣很重要
2. 幫助台灣就是幫助美國
3. 美國應該增加對台協助，例如軍售
4. 主席誇讚自己辦事認真 (也真的很認真啦)
5. 美國應該積極促使台灣加入TPP


大致先做到這裡，明天有空再做，如能有人接力就更好了。
議題牽涉很廣，以我個人之力難免理解錯誤，對內容有任何問題歡迎指正
逐字稿詳刊於本人之部落格：
http://lemondrink.pixnet.net/blog/post/40901839


旁白：


發言人：艾德‧羅伊斯 （外交事務委員會主席）










由於台灣一直沒有辦法加入該組織，導致台灣一直無法獲得關於飛航的重要資訊。






台灣的成長故事是一個轉型成功的故事。從戰後貧窮艱苦的狀態，到軍事獨裁政權

，再到今日蓬勃發展的多黨民主政治。美國人在台灣的收益，早已遠遠超越了預期。



接下來我把麥克風交給恩格爾開幕致詞，他同時也是我們委員會當中的資深副主席。


相關新聞：
1. 眾議院議員 美國外交事務委員會主席 Ed Royce
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Royce

2. Ed Royce訪台新聞--
   總統府方的聲明，Ed Royce二月底有來台灣
   http://www.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=131&itemid=31806
   外交事務委員會的考察團的確有去台南，
   不過美國人對台南的拼字不是台灣官方公布的羅馬拼音
   http://www.nownews.com/n/2014/02/19/1124506
   美議員促歐巴馬 加強對台關係
   http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140315001114-260407

3. 對美軍購仍在繼續
   自由電子報: 第3批阿帕契 10點飛抵高雄歸仁 2014.03.20 http://0rz.tw/iO120

   哎呀原來此事中國媒體還同步報導，消息真快
    http://chbcnet.com/mil/content/2014-03/04/content_782737.htm

   台戰機升級 美國會要政府撥款 (這應該會是本聽證會的重點內容)
   http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201403150133-1.aspx

   預算失衡 國會憂 傳台灣F-16戰機升級經費遭削減
   http://0rz.tw/eHLl0


4.什麼是TPP http://0rz.tw/EKN4r

美挺台入TPP　http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/201403140463-1.aspx

與馬總統不同調　薄瑞光：簽署FTA不需先有ECFA
http://www.nownews.com/n/2010/06/05/706505

經濟部長公然說謊實錄 “若不加入服貿就無法加入TPP”：
要分享的人建議分享以下這位網友看完聽證會的心得
http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1395350021.A.B08.html
聯合報載經濟部長公然說謊實錄
http://udn.com/NEWS/FINANCE/FIN1/8559218.shtml



5. 羅伊斯主席力促法案通過，使台灣得以加入國際民航組織
http://www.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=131&itemid=31806



6. 接著發言的民主黨眾議院外交委員會資深議員 Eliot Engel
   為西半球事務小組主席
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliot_Engel




原文逐字稿：00:00:01-00:06:20
The United States has not had an official diplomatic relationship with Taiwan
since officially recognizing China in1979. Today, the Obama Adminitration
face criticism from both parties over it’s Taiwan policy, including arm
sales to Taiwan and the country’s participation in free trade talks. From
the House Foreign Affairs Committee this is an hour and 20 minutes.

Rep. ED Royce (Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman)：
This hearing will come to order and I’m going to ask all members take their
seats. This hearing on the promise of the Taiwan Relations Act, let me just
say it’s been 35 years, and for that period of time, the Taiwan Relations
Act has served as the legal framework governing the important relationship
between the United States of America and the Republic of Taiwan. Since the
act came into the force in 1979, there have been few other pieces of foreign
policy legislation as as consequential as the TRA. Indeed, it is the
steadfast support of the United States congress that has helped Taiwan become
what it is today. A thriving modern society that strongly supports human
rights, strongly supports the rule of law and free markets. And it’s
democratic. The purpose of today’s hearing is to consider whether the
administration is doing enough to fulfill the larger promise of the Taiwan
Relations Act. America’s support for Taiwan is now more important than ever.
And it’s vital that we speak with one voice when it comes to our support for
Taiwan, strengthening The U.S. relationship with Taiwan is one of the
Committee’s Top legislative priorities.

In fact, I have let two bipartisan delegations to Taipei in the last 13
months. Last year, our delegation trip included a visit to Taiwan’s world
war II era submarines based near Goshun (Kaoshiung), and just last month, the
Committee delegation of eight members of Congress travels to Tinon to see
first half the fleet of the fighter jets that serves as the backbone of the
Taiwanese air force. The fact that the first batch of these jets entered into
service in 1965 is a stark reminder that Taiwan need continuous U.S. support
in order to maintain credible deterrence across the Taiwan Strait. On this
front, I reluctantly submit that we are not doing enough to meet the Strait
of the Taiwan Relations Act. We need to do more here in the United States. In
just necessary as defense sales to Taiwan, it is equally important that the
U.S. actively support Taiwan’s efforts to maintain and expand it’s
diplomatic space. When it comes to matters of public safety or public health,
the U.S. must do it’s utmost insure that Taiwan has the seat of the Table,
for this reason, I authored legislation that was signed into law to help
Taiwan participate in the international civil aviation organization last
year. Taiwan’s absence form it prevents it from obtaining air safty
information in real time. The recent disappearance of the Malaysian aircraft
highlights the importance of cooperation in the aviation field. As a result
of legislation, Taiwan has finally been able to have a seat at IKAL for the
first time since 1976. Taiwan’s participation in the Trance Pacific
Partnership Free Trade Agreement is an important opportunity that we must not
overlook. By working to include Taiwan in a high quality, multilateral trade
agreement, The U.S. would be helping to preserve Taiwan’s ability to do
business international. The event unfolding in the Ukraine remind us of the
strategic weakness of relying on one major trading partner. I understand that
the government of Taiwan will soon announce it’s intention to seek
membership in TPP. As chairman of this Committee, I strongly urged the
administration to support Taiwan’s inclusion in TPP. American consumers and
exporters would benefit. The story of Taiwan is really a story about
transformation, from the grinding poverty of the post-war era to a military
dictatorship, to a thriving multiparty democracy. The investment that
American people made in Taiwan has more than paid off. Today, Taiwan is a
beacon of democracy in a region of the world that still yearns for freedom.
The people of Taiwan have also been part of America’s success story with
many Taiwanese Americans in leaders in business and government and in their
own communities. As we acknowledge the 35th anniversary of the Taiwan
Relations Act, let us come together to support and strengthen the U.S.-Taiwan
relationship. Our actions will directly impact the future of Taiwan and our
standing in the critical Asia-Pacific region. Let me turn to Mr. Ellioti
Engel of NewYork for his opening remarks, our ranking member of the
committee.



--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 221.120.64.184
別客氣，因為我很關心。

科科
說得好，但我認為其實美國人沒考慮到這個問題

解套之道只有大家多多關心，多多討論!

                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                    你要不要看清楚我是有哪一行這麼說了?

我歡迎專家指正我的錯誤以正視聽，
但我不歡迎連內文都沒看的人隨便扣我帽子

但既然你都提起聽證會的定位了，那只好順便討論"聽證會"這東西的性質
我不知道美國法上聽證會的效力為何，
例如說，美國法上"聽證會"是否為行政機關做成行政行為
或欲達致某些法律效果的前提 (因為在台灣是這樣)

但聽證是政策形成的一環這點確實是不容否認
如要視為表達立場，形成社會共識的平台，聽證會並不為過啊
你沒看到Ed Royce從頭都是用"urge"(呼籲)嗎??

你不在意這個聽證會，不在意政策形成的過程，美國人倒是很認真。

※ 編輯: lemondrink      來自: 125.230.67.104       (03/23 18:39)

--