---

http://tinyurl.com/n6gdjvc
NYTimes的報導 說實在我認為寫得比較公允的一篇 有空的人可以看一下

http://udn.com/NEWS/WORLD/WOR6/8215628.shtml 我把UDN的網址留在這裡
我想要比較一下UDN的文章 我其實很討厭這種"綜合外電"
通常切得四分五裂又不知道重點在哪

==
UDN網站的:


從NYTimes擷取下來的:
1994年是當聯準會Board of governors成員 像台灣央行的理監事會成員
而非聯準會舊金山分行總裁 舊金山分行總裁是2004的事
通膨目標在她2010年回到Fed的Board的時候他就推動內部建立2%通膨標準了

==
UDN網站的:
"同僚形容葉倫是數據狂人，總是不斷質疑、測試自己建構的經濟觀點，
開會時從不即興發言，而會提前作準備。"

NYTimes形容Yellen第一次到聯準會舊金山分行開會的時候
"She waited only one sentence before interrupting.“Well, wait a minute,”
Ms. Yellen said. “What about this?”
And then her hands began to trace a graph in the air."

"她只等了一句話就提出質疑 然後開始指著圖表提出問題"

==
UDN:
據華爾街日報，從2009到2012年Fed官員公開發布的經濟預測中，葉倫一直最為準確。

NYTimes:
連Yellen自己都不確定自己是對的
Her warnings before the crisis, however, were tentative and inconsistent. “I
never said for sure there was a bubble, but that it was a possibility,” Ms.
Yellen said in September 2006. “I guess I was inclined to think maybe there
was. But I have seen what has happened in the last year or so, and now I’m
more dubious.” Moreover, she did not advocate for a change in Fed policy.


"She believes markets are imperfect and require significant regulation. "

那你得小心 這隻狗很可能會咬很多人

--

http://losimprevisibles.blogspot.com

              在歐洲  看著錢跟數字  滾來滾去的人生

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 213.34.69.244

--