---

http://www.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=5410

看到推文給了連結就點開來稍微看一下

發現有一點長 所以就搬出托福老師教的

只看每一段的第一句找重點

很意外 （其實不該意外？）

看了幾段實在找不到跟台獨或學運 甚至台灣本身有關的關鍵字

都是China 或 Beijing耶……




所以最簡單的處理方式就是 Ctrl F 啦

然後就發現是這樣 http://i.imgur.com/rm5XY6X.png

（而且student 0 independent 0 XD）

只有最後一段提到台灣啊OAO

而且這段還是演講完提問的內容……

從標題推測 根本人家整篇都在講中美關係

只是因為有人提問才碰到台灣的吧 囧




上面超長部份看有沒有勇者要挑戰吧

單就有提到台灣的那一段做翻譯

QUESTION THROUGH TRANSLATOR:  Hello, Mr. Secretary.  We have noted recently
that the U.S. Congress has passed an act promoting the sale of weapons to
Taiwan and promised to continue to enact the Taiwan relations -- implement
Taiwan Relations Act.  You know that Taiwan issue concerns our core
interests, and that issue, I think, has seriously disrupted China's security
interests and the China-U.S. relationship.



So my question is, against the background that both sides of China-United
States are committed to building a new model of major country relationship,
what are the measures, the policies U.S. will take to avoid having Taiwan
issue hampering the development of such a relationship?

所以我的問題是，在此狀況下，中美雙方正堅定的建立一個大國關係的新模範，美國會如何
考量讓其政策能避免台灣議題妨礙這層關係的發展呢？



SEC. HAGEL:  Thank you.  I am well aware that Taiwan is a difficult issue.
 Let me address your question in two parts.  The United States of America has
but one China policy.  We have had but one China policy since 1979. That has
not changed, nor do I believe it will change.



As everyone in this room knows the issue backward and forward, you all know
very well that this one China policy that we established in 1979 that has
been the governing relationship between the People's Republic of China and
the United States and our relationship with Taiwan was based on three
communiques.

在座的各位都知道這個議題的前前後後。你們都很清楚我們在1979年建立對中華人民共和國
和美國關係的一中政策，且我們的對台關係是建立在三公報規範上。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Communiqués

As to your reference to the Congress of the United States.  I know all of you
understand our system of democratic government pretty well.  As you all know,
we have two houses of Congress, the House and the Senate.  We have many, many
committees and subcommittees in each the House and the Senate.  I do not know
the specifics of what one of the committees in the House of Representatives
did yesterday or what's happened today.  I don't know.



But here is the point.  One committee or even one house of Congress does not
alone make policy in the United States.

但這裡有個重點。我們的委員會乃至於任一國會院會都不會獨自決定美國政策。

So without the exact knowledge and information of what happened in the House
of Representatives yesterday, I don't want to comment any further than just
say what I've said about action in the Congress.

所以在沒有對於昨天眾議院內發生的事情的額外瞭解和訊息前，我不想做出對說明國會行動
以外更進一步的評論。

But our policy remains as it has since 1979.

但我們的政策自1979年以來就一直沒有改變。

Thank you. Thank you very much.

謝謝你們。非常感謝你們。


＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝

單看這段這其實個很跳針的回答啊XD

整段結論 簡單來說

問：你們在那邊賣台灣武器 政策都不怕惹毛我們逆？

答：我們一中政策自1979沒有變過

還有眾議院昨天衝三小了我不知道辣 不要問我

我覺得看起來是這樣ˊ_>ˋ


--
                                             【你所不知道的小當家】     民明書坊

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 74.71.223.148
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1397616375.A.841.html