---

該Quora 觀點：



「人海戰術是一種正面衝鋒的戰術，藉由高密度的步兵隊形，對敵方陣線發動攻擊，而不
使用任何掩護或隱蔽手段以掩飾攻擊者的行動。」















這種戰術和人海戰術毫無共同之處，反而是相當有效率的作戰方式，最終也協助解放軍贏得
了國共內戰。有人因為它沒有使用機械化單位，就輕視這種聰明的戰術，實在太可惜了。










「在那絕望的一刻，Dytor 下了一個大膽的決定。如果他們保持原地不動，就全都會死。
退卻也不是選項。於是，他從自己讀過的一則二戰故事中得到啟發，安上刺刀，邊大聲喊叫
、邊從腰際開火，一路衝上山去，直撲敵人槍口。沉重的機槍掃射在他身旁呼嘯……」



真是英勇！那麼，如果是蘇聯人為了保衛家園和家人免於納粹種族滅絕，冒死衝鋒會怎麼樣
呢？

「掌握真實狀況的軍官們因為害怕被清算而不敢跟史達林唱反調，就這麼把荒唐的指令照
單全收。最終造成看似一堆沒有武器的步兵被無能的將軍和政委驅趕著去進行人海攻擊。 [
2] 」



能接受新事物，更具有當時來說非常強大的後勤能力。儘管如此，他們依舊被描述成笨拙的
「人海」，似乎全靠人數才壓倒敵軍。



「在那絕望的一刻，Dytor 下了一個大膽的決定。如果他們保持原地不動，就全都會死。
退卻也不是選項。於是，他從自己讀過的一則二戰故事中得到啟發，安上刺刀，邊大聲喊叫
、邊從腰際開火，一路衝上山去，直撲敵人槍口。沉重的機槍掃射在他身旁呼嘯……」



真是英勇！那麼，如果是蘇聯人為了保衛家園和家人免於納粹種族滅絕，冒死衝鋒會怎麼樣
呢？

「掌握真實狀況的軍官們因為害怕被清算而不敢跟史達林唱反調，就這麼把荒唐的指令照
單全收。最終造成看似一堆沒有武器的步兵被無能的將軍和政委驅趕著去進行人海攻擊。 [
2] 」



能接受新事物，更具有當時來說非常強大的後勤能力。儘管如此，他們依舊被描述成笨拙的
「人海」，似乎全靠人數才壓倒敵軍。



「在那絕望的一刻，Dytor 下了一個大膽的決定。如果他們保持原地不動，就全都會死。
退卻也不是選項。於是，他從自己讀過的一則二戰故事中得到啟發，安上刺刀，邊大聲喊叫
、邊從腰際開火，一路衝上山去，直撲敵人槍口。沉重的機槍掃射在他身旁呼嘯……」



真是英勇！那麼，如果是蘇聯人為了保衛家園和家人免於納粹種族滅絕，冒死衝鋒會怎麼樣
呢？

「掌握真實狀況的軍官們因為害怕被清算而不敢跟史達林唱反調，就這麼把荒唐的指令照
單全收。最終造成看似一堆沒有武器的步兵被無能的將軍和政委驅趕著去進行人海攻擊。 [
2] 」











I see often on Quora people accusing XYZ of carrying out human wave attacks, and
that this makes them bad, stupid, inferior or some other negative thing. I thin
k there is a certain dream, a left over of a forgotten age of charging into the
enemy, overwhelming them with sheer numbers. It also looks awesome in fiction, a
nd I think of things like Zerg in Starcraft, or the bugs in Starship troopers, o
r the famous scene from Enemy at the Gates. However, it’s rather nonsensical. L
et’s look at the definition of human wave attacks:

A human wave attack tactic is a frontal assault by densely concentrated infantry
formations against an enemy line, without any attempts to shield or to mask the
s actually worked. So basically, we could stop here, but let me address some of
the often cited examples in the 20th century.

1.The Russian Civil War, human wave attacks were not a tactic used by either sid
e the Red Army was a principally against it, and favored maneuver warfare and be
came one of the first armies to have mechanized infantry. The White army also di
dn’t follow do this, however some suicidal assaults by orthodox fanatics have i
ncorrectly been described as human wave attacks, but if anything these are suici
de charges against the commanders orders.

2.Japanese in WW2, deployed bayonet charges in absolute extreme situations, as d
id everyone else. This was never the official Japanese assault tactic, but was v
ery rarely used in the case of being completely out of ammo and no option for su
rrender.


3.Soviets in WW2, Soviets deployed the highest ratio of artillery and tanks to i
nfantry in all battles, the idea that Soviet infantry attacked without either is
ludicrous and a figment of the Hollywood imagination.


4.Communist Chinese the Chinese civil war and in Korea, attacked using an elabor
ate and clever tactic, sometimes called human sea attacks by fascist propaganda,
this attack type was actually very effective against a low tech army, and conti
nued to be effective until the introduction of night vision. It encompasses an a
ttack on a weak point in a line, which during the night a group of soldiers will
sneak up on, until they can throw grenades at it, following a storm of explosio
ns, the team backed up by multiple reserve fire teams, attempts to break through
the weak point in the line as fast as possible. If successful, a reserve rushes
through the gap, and infiltrates the enemy line in great numbers, soon after th
ey start collapsing the line by a series of surprise attacks from the rear.

This was not only nothing like human wave attacks, this was a highly successful
tactic that won the PLA the Chinese civil war, and people continue to belittle t
his clever tactic because it doesn’t mechanized units.

5.Viet Cong during the Tet Offensive, did not deploy any human wave attacks, the
y used infiltration to make a series of surprise attacks. Their infiltration tac
tics means they masked their soldiers, and thus again is not covered by the defi
nition of human wave. While this operation was a military failure on the part of
the Viet Cong, it was strategically important because it hurt the US determinat
ion, though it’s battlefield conditions resulted in many casualties, which may
be exaggerated in order to give the illusion of a human wave attack.
Conclusion
ate and clever tactic, sometimes called human sea attacks by fascist propaganda,
this attack type was actually very effective against a low tech army, and conti
nued to be effective until the introduction of night vision. It encompasses an a
ttack on a weak point in a line, which during the night a group of soldiers will
sneak up on, until they can throw grenades at it, following a storm of explosio
ns, the team backed up by multiple reserve fire teams, attempts to break through
the weak point in the line as fast as possible. If successful, a reserve rushes
through the gap, and infiltrates the enemy line in great numbers, soon after th
ey start collapsing the line by a series of surprise attacks from the rear.

This was not only nothing like human wave attacks, this was a highly successful
tactic that won the PLA the Chinese civil war, and people continue to belittle t
his clever tactic because it doesn’t mechanized units.

5.Viet Cong during the Tet Offensive, did not deploy any human wave attacks, the
y used infiltration to make a series of surprise attacks. Their infiltration tac
tics means they masked their soldiers, and thus again is not covered by the defi
nition of human wave. While this operation was a military failure on the part of
the Viet Cong, it was strategically important because it hurt the US determinat
ion, though it’s battlefield conditions resulted in many casualties, which may
be exaggerated in order to give the illusion of a human wave attack.
Conclusion

None of the usual suspects portrayed as being people who use human wave attacks
actually did, according to the US definition of a human wave attack. And if we l
ook at this list of people who have this slander, I hope you will notice that th
ey are all ‘eastern’ and mostly Asian. I deeply believe that the reason people
like this idea and get away with it so often, is a subtle but consistent racism
, against “eastern hordes”. A lot of people really, really want to believe tha
t if you’re east of Germany, you only ever won a battle because you had more pe
ople. Asians have a lot of people and therefore that must be why they win battle
s. Personally I find Asian history fascinating, and it’s a shame we refer to“
hordes” as many people, in reality the Mongolian horde was very often outnumber
ed, they were highly disciplined, highly trained, technologically sophisticated,
skilled horsemen and open minded, as well as having incredible logistics for th
eir time. And yet they are like many other Asians portrayed as a dumb horde over
whelming their enemy in numbers.

A British unit used their bayonets to charge an Argentinian machine gun position
, during the Falkland war, and they succeeded, with no smoke, or artillery cover
. This is, as a matter of fact, the only example of a human wave i can think of
in the 20th century which actually matches the definition of it.

In that desperate moment, Dytor decided on an audacious plan. If they stayed sti
------------




--


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.210.5 (臺灣)
※ 作者: washwall 2025-01-24 19:33:45
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1datgSJP (Military)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Military/M.1737718428.A.4D9.html

作者 washwall 的最新發文:

• +11 [分享] 參與南烏博物館掠奪的俄軍高階軍官及官 - Military 板

  作者: washwall 223.137.214.222 (台灣) 2025-01-25 21:59:47

  36F 11推
• +12 [討論] Quora:人海戰術只是具種族優越感的指控 - Military 板

  作者: washwall 114.136.210.5 (台灣) 2025-01-24 19:33:45

  124F 22推 10噓
• +5 [新聞] 英國與北約部隊為可能的俄羅斯入侵做準 - Military 板

  作者: washwall 2025-01-22 17:13:25

  13F 5推
• +3 [分享] TCH:俄軍在托列次克使用新的戰術 - Military 板

  作者: washwall 111.250.137.201 (台灣) 2025-01-22 16:40:12

  8F 3推
• +16 [新聞] 川普撤銷允許跨性別人士服役的命令 - Military 板

  作者: washwall 111.250.137.201 (台灣) 2025-01-22 14:52:45

  Millitary Times, Jan 22 2025 美國總統唐納· 川普於週一上任後不久，廢除了前總統喬· 拜登所頒布的一項規定，該規定 許跨性別人士在美國軍隊中公開服役。 該規定於2021年 …

  64F 16推

點此顯示更多發文記錄