---

※ 引述《whackup (伍陸鈽儜莣)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《aloba (aloba)》之銘言：
: :         龍門儀控系統底下，有四個主要承包商
: :         Hitachi (日本)  負責    Radwaste
: :         MHI     (日本)  負責    T'B
: :         GE      (美國)  負責    NSSS
: :         S&W     (美國)  負責    BOP
: :         其中GE再整合以下次包商：
: :         Hitachi (日本)  負責    RC&IS
: :         RDE     (德國)  負責    模擬器
: 一般大家都知道, 整合廠商數量越少越好.
: 特別是像核能這種高風險的軟體.
: 會搞到這種大雜燴的方式, 很有可能當初台電不同派系在 A 錢,
: 為了包案能夠平均分贓, 才搞出這種聯軍似的包案.
: 台電的人當然也不是不重視安全,
: 至少人家還沒找韓商這種低能工程承包商.(俄國人應該更科科)
: 但是分贓還是比絕對的安全性重要...

 本來公共建設在台灣都是先求分贓再求安全性，不要講台電，就交通建設台鐵北捷
 高捷高鐵不也一樣？

 回歸正題，原文為NRC指正DRS-CCI違反peer review(同行審查)條款，並沒有提到從
 此不審或要審兩年的事情。

原文文址︰http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1310/ML13105A050.pdf


Reply to Notice of Nonconformance No: 99901417/2013-201-01
Text from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Report No.
99901417/2013-201 and Notice of
Nonconformance will appear in italics within the body of this response.


回覆不合格點通知：99901417/2013-201-01

從核能管理委員會檢驗報告文No.99901417/2013-201不合格點的通知將回應於正文中
裡以斜體字呈現

Noncompliance Statement

"Based on the limited sample of software development activities observed and
documents reviewed up to the end of the design-phase of DRS-CCI's software
development lifecycle, the NRC inspection team determined that DRS-CCI design
activities affecting software quality, software development design change,
and modification recording were accomplished in accordance with the regulatory
requirements of Criterion Ill, "Design Control," of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part
50.

 違規聲明



However, while assessing the implementation of DRC-CCI's software
verification and validation(V& V) program,the NRC inspection team discovered
that a software engineer (a software designer),who had been a part of the
independent V& V review effort, reviewed his own work.


然而，當評估DRC-CCI的軟體核查和驗證（V＆V）計劃的實施時，NRC審查小組發現，
有一部分的軟體工程師（軟體設計師)自己獨立於V＆V自己審閱工作。

The NRC inspection team determined DRS-CCI failed to appropriately establish
and implement measures that prevent software design individuals or groups
from verifying or checking their own work within independent verification and
validation (I-V&V) processes.

This failure to meet the technical independence requirements of Criterion Ill
of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, is identified as
Nonconformance 99901417/2013-201-01."



Also...
"While assessing these final software design documents, the inspectors
discovered that a software engineer (a software designer who was a member of
the design group) was also the IV& V reviewer (a member of the testing group
who verified his own design work) for the above documents.



The inspectors learned that DRS-CCI considered assigning design personnel to
an IV& V review role was acceptable under ER7357/70 provisions and this
example was not an isolated occurrence.

However,
the inspectors did not review other examples during the inspection.
The NRC inspection team determined this did not meet Criterion Ill, "Design
Control," of Appendix B to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) Part 50, and IEEE-1012
independent V&V requirements. This issue is identified as Nonconformance
99901417/2013-201-01."


款，和IEEE-1012獨立的V＆V要求的法規10。這一問題已被確定為不合格99901417/
2013-201-01“。

.....其餘細節解釋部分自己去看。總之就是NRC審核結果認為核四DRS-CCI在設計變更中
 並未符合「設計控制」之程序，以及自己球員兼裁判，這種案例不是沒有，但沒有對
其它項目進行審查，違反迴避自我審查原則。

而核四針對NRC所指出之同行審查違規，檢討內容報告摘要︰


FDDR(Field Deviation Disposition Request)，據以現場再施工或進行軟體修改。



http://report.nat.gov.tw/ReportFront/report_detail.jspx?sysId=C10300154

報導並非如自由時報所述美國拒審，而是審核結果違規，而台電也召開因應檢討會議除
修改內容如何符合規範外並遵守迴避自審原則。以上。




--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.243.61.29
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1398441187.A.2AD.html